The rise of AI-generated content has raised many questions around copyright and ownership. As AI tools like ChatGPT become more advanced at generating written content, images, music, and more, there is uncertainty around who can claim copyright on these AI creations. Understanding the copyright rules for AI-generated content is crucial for anyone looking to utilize these emerging technologies.
What is AI-Generated Content?
AI-generated content refers to any text, images, audio, video, or other digital media that is created by an artificial intelligence system rather than a human creator. This includes:
- Text content like articles, stories, poems, tweets, and more generated by AI language models like GPT-3.
- Images created by AI image generators like DALL-E 2, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion.
- Music and other audio generated by AI systems like Jukebox.
- Video content synthesized by AI video generation tools.
These AI systems are trained on vast datasets of human-created content, allowing them to generate new content that mimics human creativity. The outputs may seem human-made, but they are entirely machine-generated without direct human input beyond providing a text prompt.
Copyright Law Basics
Before examining AI copyright issues specifically, it helps to understand some basics of copyright law. Copyright grants creators of original works exclusive rights over reproduction, distribution, public display, and derivative works. To qualify for copyright, a work must have:
Copyright does not protect facts, data, ideas, systems, or methods of operation. It only protects the original expression of those things.
Do read 👉 Copyright Quick Reference Guide
Can AI-Generated Content Be Copyrighted?
A key question around AI creations is whether they can be copyrighted at all. Currently, the position of the U.S. Copyright Office and courts is that works generated solely by an AI system, without creative input or direction from a human author, are not eligible for copyright protection.
The main barrier is the human authorship requirement. For a work to be copyrightable, it must originate from a human creator. AI systems are not legal authors, regardless of how sophisticated or “creative” their outputs may seem. However, this does not mean all AI creations are in the public domain. Situations involving collaboration between AI tools and humans raise difficult questions around copyright eligibility.
Using Copyrighted Material to Train AI
While AI creations themselves may not be protected by copyright, using copyrighted material to train AI systems implicates other intellectual property issues.
Many AI models are trained on vast datasets scraped from the internet, including both copyrighted and public domain works. This mass scraping raises concerns over copyright infringement.
However, current U.S. doctrine grants considerable leeway for this practice under fair use.
Fair use is a legal defense against copyright infringement, applicable when the use of copyrighted material is “transformative” and does not excessively damage the market for the original work. Training AI models on copyrighted data is currently permitted under fair use, as it creates a new function for the material as part of a computational process.
However, this area of law is likely to see challenges, as rightsholders argue that training AI on copyrighted works without permission goes beyond fair use protections. Courts have yet to issue definitive rulings on these issues.
Fair Use and AI-Generated Content
Fair use is a critical concept in copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders. It is often invoked in situations where the copyrighted material is used for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. However, the application of fair use to AI-generated content is a complex and evolving issue.
Supporters of a maximalist fair use approach argue that AI's learning from input data is akin to human authors drawing inspiration from pre-existing works.
They contend that copyright protection should only apply to the original expression, not the underlying ideas, which cannot be copyrighted. This perspective suggests that the AI generation process is non-infringing, thereby minimizing risks for AI providers and potentially promoting wider development of AI models trained on diverse data.
However, this approach does not necessarily provide compensation for the original content creators. Furthermore, it assesses AI-generated works on a case-by-case basis for fair use protection. Only works produced from diverse input data, which avoid copying the core expression of any input, should qualify for fair use.
Challenges in Applying Copyright Laws to AI-Generated Content
As AI technology advances, various problems arise concerning copyright laws pertaining to AI-generated material. These difficulties occur due to the distinct character of AI-created works and the existing legal structure, which was not designed to address such circumstances.
One of the major challenges is the ownership of work. Traditional copyright law is founded on the premise that humans produce original works and are thus entitled to the copyright. However, AI-generated material blurs the boundaries of authorship, creating problems about who should hold the copyright when AI systems develop creative works autonomously without direct human input.
Another challenge is detecting infringement. With AI systems producing massive volumes of content, detecting instances of copyright infringement becomes difficult. Monitoring and enforcing copyrights for AI-generated works is a complex task.
Joint Authorship with AI Systems
In instances where both a human and an AI system contribute to a work's creation, the human-generated elements may still meet copyright criteria. For example:
Determining joint authorship with an AI system depends heavily on the amount of original expression the human adds through selection, coordination, and creative control over the AI output.
Several recent court cases have begun to address the intersection of AI and copyright law. For instance, Getty Images filed a lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States for unauthorized use of copyrighted materials for training purposes. This case could potentially influence future development of AI systems by addressing principal copyright issues like fair use.
Another case involved a Washington, D.C., federal court ruling that artwork generated by artificial intelligence can't receive the same copyright protections afforded to human-created art. The judge reiterated that “human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright,” but hinted at “challenging questions” arising when artwork includes a greater level of human input into the AI-generated content.
Best Practices for Using AI Content
Given the legal uncertainties around AI and copyright, here are some best practices to consider:
The Future of AI and Copyright
As AI continues to evolve and generate more complex and creative content, the challenges surrounding copyright will likely intensify. The current legal framework was not designed with AI in mind, and as such, it struggles to address the unique issues that AI-generated content presents.
There is a need for a comprehensive and holistic approach to tackle the copyright problems associated with AI, considering both the inputs and outputs of AI systems. This approach should aim to balance the rights of human authors with the needs of a burgeoning AI ecosystem, while also considering the potential copyright infringement that may arise from utilizing copyrighted works as training data
Our Best AI Content Generators
Copyright law is racing to keep pace with rapid advances in AI content generation. While current guidance excludes outright copyright for AI outputs, human-AI collaborations and AI training implicate unresolved copyright issues. As creative AI continues proliferating, we will likely see copyright standards evolve to address these complex questions around rights and ownership for AI creations.